Parties who prefer a more general breach of contractual terms can only indicate that if one party violates the terms of the contract, the other party may sue for legal damages, as far as national law allows. On the other hand, a more detailed breach of the contract clause may define an offence, distinguish between a substantial and a minor offence, and propose corrective measures for certain types of offences. It may also permit or require an informal attempt to resolve the case before taking the matter to court. Many infringement clauses define how a party must inform the offence (e.g. by fax, e-mail or recommended letter. B). An innocent party therefore has the right to terminate a contract solely for breach of a contractual condition, refusal or right of termination. No less. In order to terminate a contract for violation of the opposition, the innocent party must inform the defensian party. Many trade agreements contain clauses that define a procedure in which termination must be carried out and in what form. Therefore, in the case of a written contract, it is necessary to ensure that the terms of the contract are verified and that compliance is guaranteed, regardless of whether the other party may have, on its face, committed a clear and negative offence. It is only when the defensian party is informed that a breach of refusal has been “accepted” that the contract is terminated. If the defaulting party is not informed that the refusal has been accepted, the contract will remain in effect.
An innocent party is not obliged to exercise its right to terminate and to accept a violation of the refusal. If they do not, the treaty will remain in force.  Standard clause: this agreement benefits the beneficiaries and beneficiaries of the transfer of the parties. However, if the colour of the tube had been mentioned as a condition in the agreement, a violation of that condition could constitute a “major” offence, i.e. a negative one. Simply because a clause in a contract is considered by the parties to be a condition, this is not necessarily the case. Such statements, however, are one of the factors considered in deciding whether it is a condition or a guarantee of the contract. Unlike where the paint of the tubes went to the root of the contract (assuming that the tubes should be used in a room dedicated to works of art related to plumbing work, or dedicated to high-fashion), this would more than likely be a guarantee, no condition.